- Livestation & CNN IBN cover Mumbai crisis
- Tilgin Sells IPTV Business To Amino
- Tele2 Winner of 2008 InfoWorld 100
- Tiscali teams up with DSG
- 4Caster C4 Wins TelcoTV 2008 Vision Award
- Brits embracing media convergence
- Hamonic Picked For IPTV Delivery by MTS
- Allied Telesis and Comtrend Offer Interoperability for Bonded Solution
- Avail Media and Verimatrix Sign up 40 Affiliates
- Sky channels available via Internet
- Microsoft embarks on IPTV joint venture in South Korea
- Open IPTV Forum publishes first Architecture Spec
- Livestation & CNN IBN cover Mumbai crisis
- IPTV World Forum announces new worldwide shows
- IPTV deployment tops DSL Forum agenda
- Sky channels available via Internet
- BBC iPlayer to show Six Nations Rugby
- December opening in Singapore for IPTV World Forum Asia 2007
- IPTV expansion in India
- 4oD registers 100 million views
- Open IPTV Forum publishes first Architecture Spec
- BT Vision gains Adult Swim animation channel
- IPTV World Forum announces new worldwide shows
- IPTV deployment tops DSL Forum agenda
- Wimbledon available on BBC iPlayer
- 4oD registers 100 million views
- IPTV coming to Xbox 360
- BBC makes iPlayer Firefox-compatible
- BBC, ITV and Channel 4 in IPTV collaboration
- Orange TV identity unveiled
Main:
IPTV Categories:
Featured IPTV:
News archives:
Tech news:
More:
Connecticut Attorney General not happy with IPTV Bill
How IPTV is regulated has suffered a small set back with a Bill that will allow providers to cherry pick and fails to protect consumer rights.
The subject of regulations on how IPTV is run now and more importantly the future are being subjected to scrutiny from all angles, and so they should be. These Bills and Rules are going to set the standards for the future of IPTV, and unlike the internet which was released and virtually allowed to grow organically it would seem that the case for IPTV is going to be strictly controlled and regulated.
The Attorney General aired his disappointment to the Bill by stating that “I am deeply disappointed by this legislation, which exacerbates an already egregious imbalance against consumers in the current cable playing field.” Which just shows that in the background and behind the scenes there are strings being pulled and the loser in any arrangement that restricts viewing or choice is almost a sort of state or corporate censorship.
IPTV is possibly heading towards a similar situation as TV where viewers have the choice of what they watch but only from what is available at that time, whereas IPTV should allow the consumers to pick and choose what they watch.
He went on to say, “It fails to establish clear standards for service quality, resolution of billing disputes and other consumer protection issues, which constitute the majority of complaints received by my office.” the Connecticut Attorney General.
Add to Bookmarks:
Related posts for Connecticut Attorney General not happy with IPTV Bill:
AT&T ordered to acquire licence for IPTV
The Attorney General of Connecticut, USA, Richard Blumenthal, has urgently requested that AT&T should acquire a cable licence for its U-verse IPTV ser...
April IPTV launch in Ireland by Smart Telecom
Smart Telecom, the second largest provider of residential, corporate and SME telecommunications services in Ireland, is planning a soft-launch in Apri...
Kay Sears appointed head Intelsat general
Intelsat Ltd will appoint Kay Sears, a former Senior Vice President of Sales and Business Development with 20 years experience in the industry, as Pre...
South Korea set for IPTV service
A bill has been passed in South Korea allowing for the launch of IPTV. The legislation creates a regulatory framework for the new technology, which is...
BT Vision gains Adult Swim animation channel
BT has announced the addition of the Adult Swim animation channel to its BT Vision IPTV service. The channel, which has a cult following in the US...
Previous: « BBC iPlayer launch on track despite DRM breach
Next: Two out of three consumers want IPTV »
Leave a Reply
Visited 508 times, 1 so far today
